28 Jul 2006 @ 6:50 AM 

I don’t often weigh in on Israeli politics, but I think we should let Israel wipe out Hezbollah. Here you have an organization that has sworn to “push every Israeli into the sea” and “reclaim” the land.
But the Left, in their “Ooh, people are getting hurt! We must stop this!” mindset (this also applies to Iraq), wants a “cease-fire” every time fighting breaks out. Ignoring the “occasional” suicide bombing of an Israeli bus, cafe, etc.
Israel must be left free to wipe out Hezbollah, Hamas, and any other organization dedicated to the destruction of the Israeli state. That’s the only way that Israel can be safe. Haven’t you noticed that there have been no military attacks on Israel since the 60’s? Why is that? Israel crushed every army that came their way.
So now the Muslims have changed tactics. Attack Israel until they fight back, then start screaming about a “cease-fire.” Then, a month or so after the cease fire, start suicide bombing them, until Israel fights back, and the process circles around itself.
Peace is not the absence of fighting. This peace is the slavery of capitulation to world opinion. There needs to be victory by Israel in order to have real peace. She must crush and kill those that seek to destroy her by any means necessary.
Git ‘R Done.

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Mark
Last Edit: 28 Jul 2006 @ 06 50 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
 25 Jul 2006 @ 9:04 AM 

I’m sorry that I’m nor more numerous in my posting, but things have been extremely busy at this new job. I only have the wherewithal to do this in the morning, and my mornings 98% of the time do not have the time for me to spend on posting to the blog. I will try to change this, but I offer no guarantees.
The days of me getting up at 8am and not having to leave for work until 10:25, when I had to work, are gone. I don’t have the time to hammer out three posts a day.
I will try to improve my output, but right now I do not offer any promises.

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Mark
Last Edit: 25 Jul 2006 @ 09 04 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
 25 Jul 2006 @ 8:31 AM 

Bill Clinton, the first black president for America, when he left office, he decided to set up an office in Harlem, supposedly to be close to “his people.”
But, like all Liberals, they cause more harm than good. Harlem to Clinton: you’re ruining us.

Bill Clinton’s decision to site his office in the largely black Manhattan neighbourhood of Harlem, as a gesture of solidarity with African-Americans, appears to have backfired.
Dozens of angry blacks demonstrated last week outside the building that houses the former president’s staff, claiming that his move had led to the gentrification of the area and increased the price of homes beyond their reach.

Typical. They want to “help,” but end up doing more harm than good.
Liberals do not count how many people they have helped, but how many people they are helping. They can’t have any body actually get off assistance, that would mean that Liberals wouldn’t be needed any more.
And quite often, when they do try to “help,” they end up making things worse.
I am reminded of the environmentalists who spray painted baby seals so that hunters wouldn’t kill the baby seals for their coats. But what really happened? The Liberals took away the only natural defense that the baby seals had against polar bears. You see, only by being stark white and motionless could baby seals hide out in the open against polar bears. Spray painted with a nice red stripe, they stood out like a sore thumb and were easy to spot when a bear got hungry.
So, President Clinton, trying to show solidarity with “his” people, gentrified the neighborhood and raised prices to a new level above the ability of the people who lived there were able to pay. Such goes the results of trying to do the right thing for the wrong reasons.

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Mark
Last Edit: 25 Jul 2006 @ 08 31 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
 14 Jul 2006 @ 7:51 AM 

About this grant writing. You see, there are two kinds of grants. You have the philanthropic grant, which is made by individuals or companies to cut down on taxes, then you have the government grants.
The government grants is the ones that get me. I wonder how much lower our taxes would be if we didn’t have all of these billions in what is known as “transfer payments” where collected taxes are paid out to another person or company. Over half of our spending comes from these transfer payments. But here’s where the dichotomy comes in, these programs are needed to get essential programs such as mine off the ground to help a lot of people.
The governmental grants are also a lot more complex. They can take up to a year to write, can be several inches thick, and have crazy requirements, such as “sign in blue ink.” If you were to sign in black ink, then the proposal would be rejected.
Don’t worry, just me wondering.

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Mark
Last Edit: 14 Jul 2006 @ 07 51 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
 11 Jul 2006 @ 9:09 AM 

In the middle of class, just wanted to check in. I’ll be home tonight and will fill you in on all the gory details.

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Mark
Last Edit: 11 Jul 2006 @ 09 09 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
 10 Jul 2006 @ 7:40 AM 

Well, I’m in Nashville today and tomorrow for a grant writing class. Had fun last night at a blues and boogie bar with some friends, and while I wasn’t hung over this morning, it was certainly hard to fall out of bed. ;-)
Anyhow, just thought you’d like to know. I’ll see if I can’t post something this morning or this evening.

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Mark
Last Edit: 10 Jul 2006 @ 07 40 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
 06 Jul 2006 @ 8:14 AM 

I don’t normally delve into Memphis Politics, it makes a Gordian knot look like a square knot, but the Tennessee Guerrilla Women decided to make this one a target, so I’m shooting back.
There are several mega-churches here in Memphis, where membership is in the thousands. The World Overcomers Church is one of them. They boast a roller rink, a bowling alley, a book store and other amenities.
What caused the uproar is on July 4th, they unveiled “The statue of Liberation through Christ,” which is basically the Statue of Liberty, but instead of a torch, she holds a cross, and instead of “July 4th, 1776″ on the tablet, the passage for the Ten Commandments in her other arm. She also has the word “Jehovah” across the face of her crown.
And it’s not just this statue, but where it’s located, right at the busy intersection of Winchester and Kirby Parkway. I drive through this intersection every week on my way to my Thursday wargaming club at the Battle Bunker.
Now let’s get this straight, there is no copyright issue here, the church got permission from the government to copy the statue, with the changes. No, what the problem with the TGW is someone dares flaunt Christianity in their faces. Egalia, the author of the post is “ready to move out of the Bible Belt” because of this. You see, it has them in an anti-Christian tizzy fit because Christians shouldn’t try to spread the word of God.
Of course, if an abortion group had come up with their own version (I can’t imagine what it could be) then it would be alright with the TGW. It’s only when it conflicts with their agenda is something like this “wrong.”
I personally have no position on this, one way or the other. It’s a privately built statue, on private property. They obtained the necessary permits before building and to me, it’s a respectful copy of the original.
Let them have at it.

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Mark
Last Edit: 06 Jul 2006 @ 08 14 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
 04 Jul 2006 @ 9:35 AM 

That is a tough thing to explain.
I want you to think about the last words in the Declaration. “…we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” After the Declaration in the next post, you’ll read a story about the Founding Fathers, and how much signing that document cost them.
I am not normally a verbose kind of writer, you know that if you have read this blog. I make a point and let you decide to agree with it or not.
But today, with all of the festivities, I want you to remember how many people died to give birth to this country. A land where Freedom still means something. If you don’t think we have the greatest system in the world, where anybody can become a millionaire, look at the people coming here. Cubans make rickety rafts and risk their lives across 90 miles of open ocean to make it to Florida. Chinese box themselves into shipping containers, no light, no toilet except for a bucket for months while the cargo ship makes it’s way across the Pacific. Mexicans cross the desert to make it here. From Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, only the United States has immigrants from all over the world.
I was lucky. I was born here, I was able to serve my country for over 13 years. I understand what this precious and precarious thing Freedom is.
Freedom can be best described by these words, Rights, Responsibility and Respect.
Our Constitution does not grant Rights to the people, but it recognizes these Rights as God-given and is told to leave them alone. These Rights are inherent, the basis of all freedoms and laws in this country.
Responsibility should define itself, but let us do it for her. Responsibility means that there is a burden upon those who wish freedom, and that is the Responsibility for its upkeep. You are a poor person (in the ideological sense) indeed if you do not expend the effort to support this great country. Serve in the military, run for office, support those who run for office, protest something you are against, these are all expressions of responsibility towards America. It means that you care. I don’t care what party you belong to, or what your views are, as long as you take action in the process we have to keep this ship afloat.
Last, but not least, Respect. A lot of people seem to forget that your freedom to swing your arm ends at my nose. Those that shout down ideas that are different from theirs is not taking part of the process. They are not being Respectful of the way things are done around here. We should be able to discuss both sides of the matter and if we can’t reach an agreement, then we can agree to disagree. But, there are those who have the “my way or the highway” mentality and that is not conductive to our process. I am not saying you should abandon your beliefs, however shoving your beliefs down someone else’s throat is not participating in the process.
Unfortunately, it seems the Left of this country, more than the Right, is all about stifling dissent and trying to “encourage” unity of thought and outcome. When instead we should be focused on unity against our enemies and equality of opportunity. I am truly sorry to hear about this, because it does not show Respect to others of this country.
Freedom is a precious thing, it has been in place here for 230 years now, and it can still be gone in an instant. Guard it with your lives, your fortunes and your sacred honor. Read the story two posts down and ask yourself if you could have risked everything you own on an idea, all for a word:
Freedom.

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Mark
Last Edit: 04 Jul 2006 @ 09 35 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
 04 Jul 2006 @ 9:29 AM 

Here is the Declaration of Independence. Read it so that you may understand what they were going through, and why they took the action they did.

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred. to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
— John Hancock
New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton
Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery
Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott
New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark
Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross
Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean
Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton
North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn
South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton
Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Mark
Last Edit: 04 Jul 2006 @ 09 29 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
 04 Jul 2006 @ 9:16 AM 

This story that you are about to read comes from Rush Limbaugh’s father. He wrote it and read it on numerous occasions.
The Americans Who Risked Everything
My father, Rush H. Limbaugh, Jr., delivered this oft-requested address locally a number of times, but it had never before appeared in print until it appeared in The Limbaugh Letter. My dad was renowned for his oratory skills and for his original mind; this speech is, I think, a superb demonstration of both. I will always be grateful to him for instilling in me a passion for the ideas and lives of America’s Founders, as well as a deep appreciation for the inspirational power of words which you will see evidenced here: “Our Lives, Our Fortunes, Our Sacred Honor”
It was a glorious morning. The sun was shining and the wind was from the southeast. Up especially early, a tall bony, redheaded young Virginian found time to buy a new thermometer, for which he paid three pounds, fifteen shillings. He also bought gloves for Martha, his wife, who was ill at home.
Thomas Jefferson arrived early at the statehouse. The temperature was 72.5 degrees and the horseflies weren’t nearly so bad at that hour. It was a lovely room, very large, with gleaming white walls. The chairs were comfortable. Facing the single door were two brass fireplaces, but they would not be used today.
The moment the door was shut, and it was always kept locked, the room became an oven. The tall windows were shut, so that loud quarreling voices could not be heard by passersby. Small openings atop the windows allowed a slight stir of air, and also a large number of horseflies. Jefferson records that “the horseflies were dexterous in finding necks, and the silk of stockings was nothing to them.” All discussing was punctuated by the slap of hands on necks.
On the wall at the back, facing the President’s desk, was a panoply – consisting of a drum, swords, and banners seized from Fort Ticonderoga the previous year. Ethan Allen and Benedict Arnold had captured the place, shouting that they were taking it “in the name of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress!”
Now Congress got to work, promptly taking up an emergency measure about which there was discussion but no dissention. “Resolved: That an application be made to the Committee of Safety of Pennsylvania for a supply of flints for the troops at New York.”
Then Congress transformed itself into a committee of the whole. The Declaration of Independence was read aloud once more, and debate resumed. Though Jefferson was the best writer of all of them, he had been somewhat verbose. Congress hacked the excess away. They did a good job, as a side-by-side comparison of the rough draft and the final text shows. They cut the phrase “by a self-assumed power.” “Climb” was replaced by “must read,” then must was eliminated, then the whole sentence, and soon the whole paragraph was cut. Jefferson groaned as they continued, what he later called “their depredations.” “Inherent and inalienable rights” came out “certain unalienable rights,” and to this day no one knows who suggested the elegant change.
A total of 86 alterations were made. Almost 500 words were eliminated, leaving 1,337. At last, after three days of wrangling, the document was put to a vote.
Here in this hall Patrick Henry had once thundered: “I am no longer a Virginian, Sir, but an American.” But today the loud, sometimes bitter argument stilled, and without fanfare the vote was taken from north to south by colonies, as was the custom. On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was adopted.
There were no trumpets blown. No one stood on his chair and cheered. The afternoon was waning and Congress had no thought of delaying the full calendar of routine business on its hands. For several hours they worked on many other problems before adjourning for the day.
Much To Lose
What kind of men were the 56 signers who adopted the Declaration of Independence and who, by their signing, committed an act of treason against the crown? To each of you, the names Franklin, Adams, Hancock, and Jefferson are almost as familiar as household words. Most of us, however, know nothing of the other signers. Who were they? What happened to them?
I imagine that many of you are somewhat surprised at the names not there: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Patrick Henry. All were elsewhere.
Ben Franklin was the only really old man. Eighteen were under 40; three were in their 20s. Of the 56 almost half – 24 – were judges and lawyers. Eleven were merchants, 9 were landowners and farmers, and the remaining 12 were doctors, ministers, and politicians.
With only a few exceptions, such as Samuel Adams of Massachusetts, these were men of substantial property. All but two had families. The vast majority were men of education and standing in their communities. They had economic security as few men had in the 18th century.
Each had more to lose from revolution than he had to gain by it. John Hancock, one of the richest men in America, already had a price of 500 pounds on his head. He signed in enormous letters so that his Majesty could now read his name without glasses and could now double the reward. Ben Franklin wryly noted: “Indeed we must all hang together, otherwise we shall most assuredly hang separately.” Fat Benjamin Harrison of Virginia told tiny Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts: “With me it will all be over in a minute, but you, you will be dancing on air an hour after I am gone.”
These men knew what they risked. The penalty for treason was death by hanging. And remember, a great British fleet was already at anchor in New York Harbor.
They were sober men. There were no dreamy-eyed intellectuals or draft card burners here. They were far from hot-eyed fanatics, yammering for an explosion. They simply asked for the status quo. It was change they resisted. It was equality with the mother country they desired. It was taxation with representation they sought. They were all conservatives, yet they rebelled.
It was principle, not property, that had brought these men to Philadelphia. Two of them became presidents of the United States. Seven of them became state governors. One died in office as vice president of the United States. Several would go on to be U.S. Senators. One, the richest man in America, in 1828 founded the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. One, a delegate from Philadelphia, was the only real poet, musician and philosopher of the signers (it was he, Francis Hopkinson not Betsy Ross who designed the United States flag).
Richard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia, had introduced the resolution to adopt the Declaration of Independence in June of 1776. He was prophetic in his concluding remarks: “Why then sir, why do we longer delay? Why still deliberate? Let this happy day give birth to an American Republic. Let her arise not to devastate and to conquer but to reestablish the reign of peace and law.
“The eyes of Europe are fixed upon us. She demands of us a living example of freedom that may exhibit a contrast in the felicity of the citizen to the ever increasing tyranny which desolates her polluted shores. She invites us to prepare an asylum where the unhappy may find solace, and the persecuted repost.
“If we are not this day wanting in our duty, the names of the American Legislatures of 1776 will be placed by posterity at the side of all of those whose memory has been and ever will be dear to virtuous men and good citizens
.”
Though the resolution was formally adopted July 4, it was not until July 8 that two of the states authorized their delegates to sign, and it was not until August 2 that the signers met at Philadelphia to actually put their names to the Declaration.
William Ellery, delegate from Rhode Island, was curious to see the signers’ faces as they committed this supreme act of personal courage. He saw some men sign quickly, “but in no face was he able to discern real fear.” Stephan Hopkins, Ellery’s colleague from Rhode Island, was a man past 60. As he signed with a shaking pen, he declared: “My hand trembles, but my heart does not.”
“Most Glorious Service”
Even before the list was published, the British marked down every member of Congress suspected of having put his name to treason. All of them became the objects of vicious manhunts. Some were taken. Some, like Jefferson, had narrow escapes. All who had property or families near British strongholds suffered.
· Francis Lewis, New York delegate saw his home plundered and his estates in what is now Harlem, completely destroyed by British Soldiers. Mrs. Lewis was captured and treated with great brutality. Though she was later exchanged for two British prisoners through the efforts of Congress, she died from the effects of her abuse.
· William Floyd, another New York delegate, was able to escape with his wife and children across Long Island Sound to Connecticut, where they lived as refugees without income for seven years. When they came home they found a devastated ruin.
· Philips Livingstone had all his great holdings in New York confiscated and his family driven out of their home. Livingstone died in 1778 still working in Congress for the cause.
· Louis Morris, the fourth New York delegate, saw all his timber, crops, and livestock taken. For seven years he was barred from his home and family.
· John Hart of Trenton, New Jersey, risked his life to return home to see his dying wife. Hessian soldiers rode after him, and he escaped in the woods. While his wife lay on her deathbed, the soldiers ruined his farm and wrecked his homestead. Hart, 65, slept in caves and woods as he was hunted across the countryside. When at long last, emaciated by hardship, he was able to sneak home, he found his wife had already been buried, and his 13 children taken away. He never saw them again. He died a broken man in 1779, without ever finding his family.
· Dr. John Witherspoon, signer, was president of the College of New Jersey, later called Princeton. The British occupied the town of Princeton, and billeted troops in the college. They trampled and burned the finest college library in the country.
· Judge Richard Stockton, another New Jersey delegate signer, had rushed back to his estate in an effort to evacuate his wife and children. The family found refuge with friends, but a Tory sympathizer betrayed them. Judge Stockton was pulled from bed in the night and brutally beaten by the arresting soldiers. Thrown into a common jail, he was deliberately starved. Congress finally arranged for Stockton’s parole, but his health was ruined. The judge was released as an invalid, when he could no longer harm the British cause. He returned home to find his estate looted and did not live to see the triumph of the revolution. His family was forced to live off charity.
· Robert Morris, merchant prince of Philadelphia, delegate and signer, met Washington’s appeals and pleas for money year after year. He made and raised arms and provisions which made it possible for Washington to cross the Delaware at Trenton. In the process he lost 150 ships at sea, bleeding his own fortune and credit almost dry.
· George Clymer, Pennsylvania signer, escaped with his family from their home, but their property was completely destroyed by the British in the Germantown and Brandywine campaigns.
· Dr. Benjamin Rush, also from Pennsylvania, was forced to flee to Maryland. As a heroic surgeon with the army, Rush had several narrow escapes.
· John Martin, a Tory in his views previous to the debate, lived in a strongly loyalist area of Pennsylvania. When he came out for independence, most of his neighbors and even some of his relatives ostracized him. He was a sensitive and troubled man, and many believed this action killed him. When he died in 1777, his last words to his tormentors were: “Tell them that they will live to see the hour when they shall acknowledge it [the signing] to have been the most glorious service that I have ever rendered to my country.”
· William Ellery, Rhode Island delegate, saw his property and home burned to the ground.
· Thomas Lynch, Jr., South Carolina delegate, had his health broken from privation and exposures while serving as a company commander in the military. His doctors ordered him to seek a cure in the West Indies and on the voyage he and his young bride were drowned at sea.
· Edward Rutledge, Arthur Middleton, and Thomas Heyward, Jr., the other three South Carolina signers, were taken by the British in the siege of Charleston. They were carried as prisoners of war to St. Augustine, Florida, where they were singled out for indignities. They were exchanged at the end of the war, the British in the meantime having completely devastated their large landholdings and estates.
· Thomas Nelson, signer of Virginia, was at the front in command of the Virginia military forces. With British General Charles Cornwallis in Yorktown, fire from 70 heavy American guns began to destroy Yorktown piece by piece. Lord Cornwallis and his staff moved their headquarters into Nelson’s palatial home. While American cannonballs were making a shambles of the town, the house of Governor Nelson remained untouched. Nelson turned in rage to the American gunners and asked, “Why do you spare my home?” They replied, “Sir, out of respect to you.” Nelson cried, “Give me the cannon!” and fired on his magnificent home himself, smashing it to bits. But Nelson’s sacrifice was not quite over. He had raised $2 million for the Revolutionary cause by pledging his own estates. When the loans came due, a newer peacetime Congress refused to honor them, and Nelson’s property was forfeited. He was never reimbursed. He died, impoverished, a few years later at the age of 50.
Lives, Fortunes, Honor
Of those 56 who signed the Declaration of Independence, nine died of wounds or hardships during the war. Five were captured and imprisoned, in each case with brutal treatment. Several lost wives, sons or entire families. One lost his 13 children. Two wives were brutally treated. All were at one time or another the victims of manhunts and driven from their homes. Twelve signers had their homes completely burned. Seventeen lost everything they owned. Yet not one defected or went back on his pledged word. Their honor, and the nation they sacrificed so much to create is still intact.
And, finally, there is the New Jersey signer, Abraham Clark.
He gave two sons to the officer corps in the Revolutionary Army. They were captured and sent to that infamous British prison hulk afloat in New York Harbor known as the hell ship Jersey, where 11,000 American captives were to die. The younger Clarks were treated with a special brutality because of their father. One was put in solitary and given no food. With the end almost in sight, with the war almost won, no one could have blamed Abraham Clark for acceding to the British request when they offered him his sons’ lives if he would recant and come out for the King and parliament. The utter despair in this man’s heart, the anguish in his very soul, must reach out to each one of us down through 200 years with his answer: “No.”
The 56 signers of the Declaration Of Independence proved by their every deed that they made no idle boast when they composed the most magnificent curtain line in history. “And for the support of this Declaration with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.”
My friends, I know you have a copy of the Declaration of Independence somewhere around the house – in an old history book (newer ones may well omit it), an encyclopedia, or one of those artificially aged “parchments” we all got in school years ago. I suggest that each of you take the time this month to read through the text of the declaration, one of the most noble and beautiful political documents in human history.
There is no more profound sentence than this: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness…”
These are far more than mere poetic words. The underlying ideas that infuse every sentence of this treatise have sustained this nation for more than two centuries. They were forged in the crucible of great sacrifice. They are living words that spring from and satisfy the deepest cries for liberty in the human spirit.
“Sacred honor” isn’t a phrase we use much these days, but every American life is touched by the bounty of this, the Founders’ legacy. It is freedom, tested by blood, and watered with tears.
- Rush Limbaugh

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Mark
Last Edit: 04 Jul 2006 @ 09 16 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
\/ More Options ...
Change Theme...
  • Users » 7
  • Posts/Pages » 2,097
  • Comments » 253
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight

About



    No Child Pages.