The NYT is working for the enemy
I'm sure you've heard the news. The New York Times revealed a secret program that we were using to track money transfers between terrorists.
Now, if this had been an illegal action, the NYT might have a leg to stand on, but they don't. There was nothing against the law on this project, and all that happened was the NYT told the terrorists that their money is being tracked. Which means they will now use other, possibly undetectable means to move their cash.
Make no mistake about it, this is treason. This is an active move helping the enemy in a time of war. No other word describes the action. The NYT, in their efforts to embarrass "Bushitler" has crossed the line. The only thing that lets them get away with this heinous act is the fact that they published it in their paper instead of giving it to Al Qaeda covertly.
What they did is within the letter of the law, but not the spirit. If this had been a Liberal President, the NYT would have killed the story, "out of respect for the office." No such courtesy for a Conservative.
It used to be that papers would consider the security of the country before publishing things like this, but not any more. It is the Liberals, and make no mistake about it, this is a Liberal paper, that will sacrifice anything, including national security, to embarrass or bring down President Bush. But like a bad sniper, they are killing everybody but the target.
I wonder that would happen to the NYT if another terror attack occurs on New York, and it comes out that it could have been stopped, except that the NYT rendered the necessary operation impotent because they published about it?
Just a thought.




