« June 2005 | Main | August 2005 »

July 31, 2005

Blogger Bash Report

I got to attend a send-off bash at dish to Dr. Abby who is heading away from Memphis and on to Boston. We also got to meet Abby's parents. Also attending was: Mike, Len and Brock, Aaron Hurley, EJ, Phil, Chris, and Bruce who made it all the way from Boston! And, of course, myself.

Here are a few pictures that I took. Click on them for full size:

I treated myself for once, ordering a "Shish kebab of garlic marinated lamb" and an oatmeal stout. That dinner was absolutely to die for, and was worth every penny. Too bad I can't do this on a regular basis. The ambiance was very casual, the company fantastic and the conversations stimulating. Too bad Len didn't get to finish his thoughts over the Valerie Plame affair.

I look forward to the next blogger bash.

UPDATE: Bruce came form Baltimore, not Boston. Thanks Abby!

July 29, 2005

Things are not looking good

I'm in the middle of an attack right now, so no news today. If I feel better before I go into work, I'll post some housekeeping stuff.

Closet time now. Be back later.

July 28, 2005

I made the Washington ComPost!

Well, well, well! I must be moving up in the world. I got home from a game if Epic:Armageddon with Mike and found a mini-instalanche and an amazing 7 comments on my Hanoi Jane post.

It was a comment by Alpha Patriot that I found out that I made the Washington ComPost. And guess what? Yours Truly is the first one quoted! Woo Hoo!

Of course, the Moonbats descended on me like bears on honey, but as you'll see in the next post I took them all on.

I hope Mr. Kurtz keeps reading and quoting me. This kind of advertisement I can't buy!

Thanks all and I hope you stick around!

So many moonbats, so little time

Well, here's my rebuttal to comments left on my post about Hanoi Jane.

I AM INFURIATED. HOW DARE YOU CRITICIZE JANE FONDA YET AGAIN. In all your Conservative ramblings about Hanoi Jane NOT ONCE HAVE YOU BASTARDS COME OUT AND ADMITTED THE TRUTH - JANE FONDA WAS RIGHT. Viet Nam was a mistake - this iraq invasion is an even bigger mistake - SO YOU BASTARDS - SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTHS and take that draft-dodging traitor president with you.

What is the difference between Jane Fonda and George Bush?

Jane Fonda has been to Viet Nam.

You lowly pieces of garbage that criticize Jane Fonda while supporting that chicken hawk president Bush are fucking complete idiots.

SO SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!

Posted by: Mark Esposito at July 27, 2005 09:51 AM

Obviously, you aren't a big fan of history and you like to Monday Morning Quarterback. You also have a problem expressing yourself intelligently, if you can't do it without expletives, it shows you're already too wound up about it and can't think straight.

Just remember it was your beloved JFK who got us into Vietnam, and it was your wonderful buddy LBJ who escalated the war. Nixon was the one who got us out, remember?

If you read my archives, you will see my views on the Iraq war, as a way to create conditions that will not create more terrorists. If we can create a stable economy where young Arab men 18-25 have jobs and families, they won't become suicide bombers. That is the objective of the Iraq war.

As far as draft dodging, let's just compare. President Clinton left the US under a Rhodes Scholarship to study in England. President Bush stayed in the US, and became a fighter pilot for the Texas ANG. Several ANG units were called up to service in Vietnam. Besides, how can you question the courage of a man who straps on a supersonic fighter that had a tendency to explode and lights the fuse? The Century Series of interceptors had a bad safety record. When pushing the envelope, they had a tendency to blow up or come apart. Which is the last thing you want to have happen at Mach 2 and 30,000 feet.

Traitor, huh? What if she had sold anti-tank missiles to the ayotollahs who, at the time, were calling for the destruction of the Great Satan America? Let's see waht selling weapons to an enemy of the United States will get you. You get your own show on Fox and are called a good friend of Sean Hannity and a great American. It sure helps to have your felony convictions overturned because of a deal you struck with the prosecutors. Oliver North comitted acts of treason. He just didn't have his picture taken while he was at it.

Posted by: Charley Micinacina at July 27, 2005 10:14 AM

You, sir, are obviously without nuance, something that you claim the Right is lacking. At the time of Ollie's transgression, Iran and Iraq was engaged in a rather bloody and drawn out war. Sure, we didn't like Iran, but we liked Iraq even less. Oops, there's those shades of gray that us nasty old Conservatives don't see.

In the world of international politics, you generally don't get to pick your friends. You pick the enemy of my enemy, which may be a very nasty and despicable individual. If you can remember that far back, surely you will remember that we at one time backed the Taliban, simply because they were fighting the Soviets. Politics make strange bedfellows.

Your really pathetic. Vietnam as history shows was a mistake. Although her actions in Hanoi may not of been exactly right; her heart was in the right place. Since when does the greatest democratic country in the world oppose freedom and non aggression? Since when does a country, via its press, condemn a person who has the right to speak his or her mind. Your job is to report the news. Not take sides. What is becoming of the greatest nation on Earth? Freedom of speech is the most important right we have. Vietnam was wrong, Iraq was wrong, and the statistics show it. I don't much in the surveys since the sentences used are ambigious. But look at the facts: the military cannot meet its quota anymore. Thats been happening for months now. That speaks for itself. Many will not volunteer for a conflict that was perpetrated by Bush. Second; We have 100,000 civilian, mercenaries in Iraq. Not military, but civilians providing the services that our military would normally do. This was never intended to be a war. It was all economics as was Vietnam. There is no domino effect in foreign policy here. Rather, its a country that has become the most hated nation in the world. Think about that and smoke your pipe. We need to change, and change fast.

Posted by: JR at July 27, 2005 10:45 AM

Well, you're kinda pathetic too, since you can't use the Kings English properly. You've also got a few things wrong. First of all, I am not a reporter. I am a man with a view who likes publicizing it. I put your feedback here and am responding to it simply because it amuses me, not because of some journalistic ethos.

Also, we are not the hated country you delude yourself into believing. We are the only country in the world where people from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe are fighting to get into. People from Mexico risk their lives across miles of open desert to get here. People from China lock themselves in cargo containers for two months with nothing more than a bucket for a toilet and you think these people hate us? I really doubt it. Sure there are people who hate us, but they are a small and vocal minority, amplified by the Liberal bias of the MSM.

The Army hasn't been meeting it's quota for several months now because Congress authorized an increase of the Army by 30,000. And Hillary was backing another 80,000 increase on top of the 30,000 already authorized. Do you think 30,000 young people will suddenly appear in one day? I think not. Recruitment is up, retention is up. It will take time to fill that extra Division of troops.

YOU IGNORANT ASSHOLE. THE TRAITER IS DICK CHENEY, WHO AS CEO OF HALIBURTON DID BUSINESS WITH SYRIA, IRAN, LIBYA, NORTH KOREA, AND IRAQ. I WOULD LIKE TO PUT MY SHOE UP YOUR ASS, BUT WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY DENT YOUR PEA SIZED BRAIN.

Posted by: RICK COLE at July 27, 2005 04:32 PM

At least I don't leave the Caps Lock key on. And a puerile attempt at violence. I thought you people were pacifists?

Ah, yes, the dreaded "H" word, Haliburton. The evilest of the evil oil businesses who likes to make money. Sorry, but trying to make money doesn't make you evil. If you can prove that anything Haliburton did was against the law, then you've got something to take to the press. I'm sure they will trumpet it to the four corners of the world.

ummm...what if jane fonda had exposed a CIA officer in an attempt to smear somebody who disagreed with her positions? Jane Fonda is exercising her right to free speech. isn't that what you conservative morons claim to be fighting for?

i don't even understand how you can see this administration as conservative??? there is nothing conservative about them. put down your remote control, turn off the fox bullshit and try thinking for yourself...just once...for a couple of minutes. it'll hurt at first, but you'll be ok.

Posted by: Jeff Kanzler at July 27, 2005 08:56 PM

There is a difference between exercising free speech and committing treason. Just like you can't shout "FIRE!" anywhere unless there really is a fire.

Second, I don't watch Fox. I can't afford cable. While I do read Foxnews.com, it is one of many news sources I depend upon, just look to the right.

Also, this administration is Conservative. They stand for individual rights, lower taxes, freedom in its many forms and so on. While I don't agree with everything that this administration does, it is by far better than the Clintons.

And I do think, sir. I think about more things than you'll ever know.

What's more, Little Georgie is a draft evader, deserter, war criminal and coward. his Daddy was a war criminal, traitor and coward and even his grandfather has been accused of collaboration (treason?) His brothers are scum too. That's just for background.

I doubt Fonda lengthened the war, but some people say Nixon caused an additional 20,000 dead GI's by scuttling the peace talks when he was running for President.

When McNamara confessed that they knew the war couldn't be won, the Vets all raged at him, "if you knew it couldn't won, why didn't you get us out?" I said, bullshit, if he had advocated "cutting and running", those assholes would have assassinated him. Ditto Iraq.

PS how do I start a new paragraph?

Posted by: Monte Haun at July 27, 2005 11:34 PM

And you have documentation for all of this? Why not turn it over to the MSM?

The Vietnam War was not winnable from the start. In a lot of respects it was like Korea, except in Korea the general after Macarthur realized that the only way to "win" would be by a settled political solution. Through a war of attrition, we forced the NK to the bargaining table and negotiated a cease fire. It was our fear of another repeat of Korea (China getting involved) in Vietnam that caused our failure. We never went North of the DMZ. And Napoleon once said, "The inevitable end of all defensive warfare is defeat."

PS You start a new paragraph by hitting your Enter key twice in quick succession.

And last but not least:

The slope-skulls worship the military. Their claims that she is a traitor are not based on any understanding of the law, but rather on a purely emotional reaction. If they really cared, Ollie North would be in prison right now where he belongs.

Fuck the Troops: http://simonandthelefties.blogharbor.com/

Posted by: Toby at July 28, 2005 03:06 AM

I don't think I can say anything, you've stated your position pretty clearly, and anything I could possibly say would not improve upon it.

Thanks all for reading this long post. I hoped you enjoyed reading it as much as I did writing it.

July 27, 2005

Free Speech for Me, not for Thee

Remind me never to go to college. On Campus, Only Some Free Speech Protected.

Here is an email, and the response to it. No editing, the complete emails.

On March 7, Arlene Holpp Scala (search), chair of the Women's Studies Department, sent Daniel an unsolicited of an upcoming film event: "'Ruthie and Connie: Every Room in the House,' a lesbian relationship story." Scala advised those who wished to respond, "Please do not hit reply, click here," thus directing messages to her university e-mail address.

All well and good. Something you expect from a typical Liberal campus.

Now the reply:

On March 8, Daniel clicked to privately reply, "Do not send me any mail about 'Connie and Sally' and 'Adam and Steve.' These are perversions. The absence of God in higher education brings on confusion. That is why in these classes the Creator of the heavens and the earth is never mentioned." [His message is quoted in full. No other communication with Scala ensued.]

Another all well and good. A polite reply to keep this garbage out of his mailbox. Oh no! He mentions 'God!' You can't do that on a University!

Read the article. It's a lot of links as it's been taken up by an outside agency and the state Attorney General.

It's a big hullabaloo over one persons insensitivity. She got just what she deserved. Ms. Holpp Scala thought she was being helpful, but just cast too wide a net and caught the wrong guy.

Some people can, but I can't blame the guy for venting his frustration and expressing the base of his moral fiber.

Just another example of how 'free' speech works.

July 26, 2005

Discovery is away!

STS-114 is now underway, and on the way to orbit.

All systems go. Fly baby fly!

Hanoi Jane is at it again

Just to let you know, tigers can't change their stripes. Jane Fonda Plans Anti-War Bus Tour.

In 1972, she committed Treason when she collaborated with the enemy and urged that US soldiers quit fighting. Today, she is calling for an immediate troop withdrawal from Iraq, leaving them in the lurch and unable to withstand the terrorist forces.

This B-I-T-C-H is a traitor twice now in my eyes. She has the right to voice her opinions, but her past actions have branded her a traitor and she deserves to be treated like one.

Hillary is moving farther "right"

Here you go. Hillary Clinton Moving Farther Right Before '08.

Hillary is walking a dangerous tightrope here. She is trying to move as far Right as she can, appealing to as many Centrist and Republican voters as possible, but she must not move so far Right that she endangers her support from her Liberal base.

She talks the talk, but when it comes to walking the walk, she's a extreme Liberal. She hasn't given up her idea of Socialized health care, she still holds the view of "It takes a village" and she was the real driving force behind the reign of Bill Clinton.

Keep an eye on her folks. She thinks she deserves to be President.

A congressman who speaks his mind

Rep. Tom Tancredo sure stirred up a hornets nest the other day. Hispanic, Islamic groups want Tancredo to quit.

The Hispanics are upset because Tancredo wants to stiffen the border with Mexico and make it harder for illegals to cross.

The Muslims are outraged because he suggested that we nuke Mecca and other Islamic holy cities in retaliation to our cities being nuked by Al Qaeda.

You keep right on trucking Tom. We need more security in the border regions, and we need a clear message to the Islamic community that we will not calmly accept an American Hiroshima.

"What would happen if a prominent Muslim made that statement about Catholic holy places like the Vatican?," Ali asked.

Believe me, if the Muslim extremists thought they could gain anything by nuking the Vatican, they would have done it already.

The threat of nuking Mecca, et. al., is not to deter the extremists, if anything that will do nothing more than strengthen their resolve to carry out their plans. No, it is to provide an incentive to the moderate Islamic community to rein in the extremists.

Do you think we will idly accept the destruction of up to seven cities and the death of about 4 million people? I don't think so. I am quite sure that there is a SSBN in the Indian Ocean right now, tasked with the destruction of Iran, Mecca and several other cities throughout the Middle East. That would be an order not lightly given.

Will this cut down on spam?

I didn't know the Russian people hated spammers this much: Russia’s Biggest Spammer Brutally Murdered in Apartment.

Vardan Kushnir, notorious for sending spam to each and every citizen of Russia who appeared to have an e-mail, was found dead in his Moscow apartment on Sunday, Interfax reported Monday. He died after suffering repeated blows to the head.

One of my email accounts is constantly getting Russian spam. Why, I don't know because I can't read Cyrillic. Hopefully I won't see as much now. I'm at least kinda sorry that he's gone, but how can you miss a spammer?

July 25, 2005

When does it become mandatory?

I happened across this wonderful op-ed piece and I wanted to share it with you. Biochips Endanger Privacy.

The article opens with this thought:

Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them. – Frederick Douglass

Just how much injustice are we going to allow? Biochips are an invasion of privacy, let alone the Biblical implications. To be tracked wherever you go, to have these movements logged and cataloged somewhere just gets my dander up.

Never mind what I am doing, illegal or not, I do not want to be tracked.

For those thinkers who think getting rid of Evil will leave only Good, you're wrong. To get rid of world wide hunger is a great idea. But when it comes at the cost of freedom, the cost is too high.

And that is exactly what is coming down the road with these biochips. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon.

Read the article, I hope you will be as shocked and scared as I was.

Dumb politician

I don't think this needs a lot of explaining. Found on Neal Boortz.

There is a time and a place for everything, and this fact is often lost on those politicians on the extreme left. To them, everything is a cause, and politics rules the day. Today brings news of such an example.

Thirty-two-year-old Marine Staff Sgt. Joseph Goodrich died in Iraq two weeks ago during a mortar attack. At his funeral last Tuesday in Pittsburgh, there were quite a few people packed into the church to pay their respects.

Enter Lt. Gov. Catherine Baker Knoll. The good lieutenant governor decided it would be a good time and place to do a little campaigning. She went into the church and during the distribution of communion, took a seat and started asking around to find the family. She also passed around a business card, telling a family member "'I want you to know our government is against this war." Not sure what that means....presumably she meant the government of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Whatever.

Some people see a funeral, this woman saw a campaign opportunity. As you might expect, people are outraged. Governor Ed Rendell is going to apologize to the Marine's family and says he is disturbed by what took place. Rumors have already begun swirling that he might drop her from the '06 ticket.

Now would be a good time.

Some people just have no ethics. Assuming that the family was against the war because of the death, she went in for the kill. Too bad she misread and didn't see a bunch of people who understood the reason for the war and while saddened by the loss, these people were still committed to see it through.

Shame on you Lt. Governor Knoll.

Stupid woman, stupid lawsuit

Here's a wonderful story from FOX News:

Skateboarder Sues Utility Over Manhole Branding

NEW YORK (AP) — A woman who was branded with letters from the Consolidated Edison logo when she fell off a skateboard onto a searing hot manhole cover in Manhattan last year filed a lawsuit Thursday seeking unspecified damages from the utility.

Elizabeth C. Wallenberg, 27, was burned just above her buttocks and on her left arm when she fell off her skateboard onto a cover over a steam pipe at Second Avenue and 13th Street in the East Village shortly after midnight on Aug. 11, 2004, said her lawyer Ronald Berman.

"It literally looked like a brand that had been applied by someone," Berman said about the burn marks left on Wallenberg's body.

He said she was treated for the injury in the Beth Israel Hospital emergency room and released.

Wallenberg, then a Brooklyn resident who worked for Paper magazine, reportedly said she heard her skin sizzle and saw an "o" and an "n" from the hot cover impressed upon her body. Wallenberg has been told the scarring is permanent, Berman said.

The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan's state Supreme Court, accused Con Ed of "negligence, carelessness, recklessness and culpable conduct" related to Wallenberg's injuries.

Court papers said Wallenberg, now a factory worker who lives in Portland, Ore., is entitled to compensatory and punitive damages because of Con Ed's "reprehensible and egregious failure and refusal ... to protect the public from this manifestly clear and present danger."

Con Ed spokesman Chris Olert said he had no comment on the lawsuit.

So this woman falls off her skateboard and onto a manhole cover for a steam pipe. She gets permanently scarred by the experience, and she wants ConEd to foot the bill. Why? Why should someone else have to pay for her stupidity? Was she wearing safety equipment? Was she drunk? Why was she going down the middle of the street in the first place? I don't know, the article doesn't say.

All I do know is she wants to hold someone else responsible for her mistake, and that's not right. In this world you are going to get bumps and bruises when you do things like that, take your lumps and move on.

July 22, 2005

Ask her why

Here you go. A classic case as to "you have the freedom to only do what we want you to do." Grand Old Party Pooper?

The principal of a school, who happens to be the wife of a Democrat State Assemblyman, went ballistic over a picture of President Bush, displayed with other Presidents, and fired the teacher responsible. Now the teacher is suing and wants her job back. You are free to ask the principal why she did such a thing, here is her information:

Principal Joyce Becker-Seddio
Birch Lane Elementary School
E-mail: jbecker@msd.k12.ny.us
(516) 797-6010

I hope her email box explodes.

Buy this shirt

In New York, they are starting a police of random -but routine- searches of commuters. In wake of that decision, this shirt has come about. NYers to NYPD: 'I Do Not Consent to Being Searched'.

While commuters have the "option" of declining, if the officer feels like there is probable cause, he can detain and even arrest you if he feels it necessary, based on how nervous you are.

What a country. Can't you just feel the freedom here? [/sarcasm]

Patriot Act news

In a related article, the PATRIOT Act is becoming 'semi-permanent'. House Votes to Extend Patriot Act.

In a knee-jerk reaction to the bombings in London, lawmakers move to extend the PATRIOT Act, which is set to expire later this year.

I have never been a fan of this Act, I feel it infringes on too many basic freedoms. I don't care if it makes me "safer," I would rather be free and live with the risk than give up freedoms and still have to live with the risk.

"Periodically revisiting the Patriot Act is a good thing," said Rep. Martin Meehan, D-Mass. "The Patriot Act was an effort to answer the most difficult question a democracy faces: How much freedom are we willing to give up to feel safe?"

None, Congresswoman, none. Ben Franklin and all that.

Stand and Salute

The last of a group of very brave men has died. Last of the WWII Comanche Code Talkers Dies.

These men were called into service not to fight, but to use their native language as an unbreakable code against Germany. Like their Navajo brethren in the Pacific, the enemy was never able to make heads or tails out of the code.

July 21, 2005

Schedule change!

Well, the schedule change is here. Starting Tuesday, I will be working four 6 hour days instead of three 8 hour days. This will get me working Tuesday-Friday, so now I can have Saturday off again! Yay! I can wargame with more people (Saturday is the busiest day at the Battle Bunker) and I can fly rockets again!

Let's hope this will work out and I won't have to change my schedule again, as this change was like pulling an impacted wisdom tooth.

Epic battle report

Real life buddy Mike and I get together on Wednesdays and beat the snot out of each other in Epic:Armageddon. We played a 6,000 point game last night, just about every thing in both of our inventories.

The game opened with me being fairly strung out, while Mike was stepping all over himself, being tightly packed in a corner. I acted out of character and played aggressively, putting Mike off his plan a little. Normally I don't play so aggressive, which is exactly why I played so.

I swept my left flank around to his forces, and kept him from half of the board, including control of my objectives. My blitzkrieg was guarded by both my Whirlwinds and a detachment of Tactical Marines. His Blitzkrieg was protected by a single tactical detachment. I pounded one tactical detachment, his biggest point unit. I broke it, then wiped it out with a Thunderhawk strike.

Turn two opened with both of us teleporting Terminators onto the others Blitzkrieg. He wiped out my Whirlwinds, I killed a couple of Land Raiders. Both of our Terminator detachments died gloriously. I tried to break his left flank, but a Thunderhawk strike all but wiped out one tactical detachment, while a set of tanks rushed to support another detachment under fire. My forces continued to drive back his right flank, compressing his forces further and limiting his ability to maneuver. My assault Marines from the Thunderhawk strike managed to wipe out his Whirlwinds, but were mortally wounded from all of the supporting fire from all of the other units in the area from his tight formation.

Turn three saw more teleportations, both of us descending on the others Blitzkrieg objective. I got to assault first, but he beat me off. I got to activate my titan before he could assault and managed to almost wipe out his Terminators, keeping my Blitzkrieg safe and intact.

It was down hill from there, both of us had control of the objectives on our side of the board, but I had forces on his side of the board and I killed his biggest point unit, giving me a 3-1 point win.

Mike had a short, tight line, and a lot of depth in his formations, leading to his being a tough nut to crack, but he could not maneuver because of his tightly packed formation. He learned Napoleons maxim, "All defensive warfare ultimately leads to defeat." He had no right flank to speak of, but other than my titan I had nothing to continue the push. His left flank was moderately secure, but I had the ability to at least try and push him off the objective he was guarding. But with two full strength tactical units nearby, I wouldn't have made too much of an inroads.

All-in-all, a fun game with lots of thinking and good natured ribbing both ways. I would love to see more people play Epic, but Wednesday night is just not the night to see a lot of players. That will change as you have already read from the prior post.

Thanks for reading.

Nothing much today

I have been getting up early for the last couple of weeks, but today I couldn't get out of bed. When I did, I just crawled into the recliner and slept another hour.

And I've been missing a lot of stuff. Glenn Beck has had a guy on about the American Hiroshima, an Al Qaida plan to detonate up to 7 nuclear weapons in the U.S. It sounds scary and it should be. If you live in a target city, you could be living on borrowed time.

I also missed the "attempted" bombings in London. Of course, it seems like nothing at this point in time, could this be a prank or something.

I'll talk to you later when I'm feeling better.

July 20, 2005

Fast Facts on John Roberts

From Fox News: Fast Facts: John G. Roberts.

EXPERIENCE

— on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit since June 2003.

— one of President Bush's least contentious picks for the bench.

— former Rehnquist clerk, Roberts was associate counsel to President Reagan from 1982-86 and then served in the first Bush administration, arguing cases before the Supreme Court from 1989-93.

— during the Clinton administration, became a highly sought-after private lawyer in Supreme Court cases, representing clients such as the National Collegiate Athletic Association in a discrimination case, and carmaker Toyota in winning limits on a disabled workers claims.

— had been in line to join the appeals court in 1992, but nomination during the first Bush administration died in a Democratic-controlled Senate.

— 146 members of the D.C. Bar signed a letter urging his confirmation, including officials from the Clinton administration.

EDUCATION

— received his undergraduate and law degrees from Harvard.

PERSONAL

— 50 years old

— native of Buffalo, N.Y.

You can bet that the long knives will be out for Mr. Roberts. The Democrats will grill him like a cheese sandwich. Let's hope he can take the heat and make it through intact.

Moonbat MoveOn

The Loony Left Wing strikes again. MoveOn Sees Conspiracy in Roberts Timing.

Just like the DNC President Howard Dean thinks that Tom DeLay should go to jail without a trial, MoveOn thinks Karl Rove should be fired and go to jail, even when Rove has committed no crime. Even when there is no evidence that a crime has been committed by anybody, let alone Rove.

Now the Moonbats are accusing the Bush administration of doing exactly what their darling Clinton did: Do something newsworthy to get something embarrassing off the front pages. In President Clintons case, it was launching a few cruise missiles into Iraq to get Monica Lewinsky and her stained dress off the front pages.

Too bad that isn't the case here. It just so happens that there is a real vacancy in the SCOTUS, and President Bush is trying to fill that spot before the SCOTUS convenes on the first Monday of October.

One of these days MoveOn and their ilk might get it right.

But I wouldn't count on it.

Newdow Update

I have been following Michael Newdow and his crusade to eliminate the "Under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance since I started this blog. Well, here is another step. A Judge has thrown out a large portion of his case, limiting the case to just the pledge in the school. Newdow cannot challenge the pledge itself. Judge Will Throw Out Parts of Newdow's Pledge Case.

In the wake of the SCOTUS decision to punt, this is the only possible thing the judge could have done. By limiting the question to a yes/no possibility to if the Pledge belongs in the schools at all, it is a pretty good chance that Newdow will go down in flames.

Good for him. It is a bad thing for one person to have the power to control over the entire country like this. If he doesn't like "Under God" in the pledge, then he can just shut up when it comes to those two words. I don't care if he's offended by them, there's lots of things that offend me, but I realize we are a country of freedoms and I must let other people express their freedoms, as long as it doesn't directly affect me.

Bad science, bad policy

Here you go. Bad Research Leads to Bad Law.

This article goes into how bad scientific practices make it into law. When one-third of "hard science" (medicine, physics, etc.) studies can be called into question, what about the "soft sciences" where it is largely interpretation of the data that determines the outcome?

This is not a mere academic matter. Inaccurate studies become entrenched in laws that govern our daily lives. Using VAWA [Violence Against Women Act] as an example again, the Act incorrectly assumes that women, and not men, are the victims of domestic violence, and it has been influential in denying men access to shelters. This denial often extends to the older male children of women who seek assistance.

The act also calls for more studies, a perpetuating act.

When three soft science researchers can look at the same data and come up with three different conclusions, all based on their judgment and agendas, we should not be making law based on these studies. But that is exactly what is happening today, especially with Liberal causes.

It may surprise people, however, to hear that I don't think political agendas are inevitable within the soft sciences. Even on controversial subjects like rape, it is possible to find interesting studies in which researchers sincerely pursue solid data.

But you have to go back a few decades. In his book from the '70s, "Men who Rape: The Psychology of the Offender," Nicholas Groth offered a theory that sounds almost jarring to today's ears. He wrote, "One of the most basic observations one can make regarding men who rape is that not all such offenders are alike." That is, a drunken boyfriend who rapes because he does not hear the "no" being uttered should not be placed in the same research category as a back alley rapist who leaves his victim physically crippled for life.

A rape researcher could not make that statement today on a college campus. He would be fired, bludgeoned into silence, or his funding would be yanked. There is now only one acceptable view of rape; it is an act of power. There is only one research category of rapist: the oppressor.

Has it been that long when soft science had the ethics to get to the truth of things, and not conform with some Political Correctness whiner?

We're in more trouble than I thought.

Hawai'ian News

This is important to me, as I spent 6 years in Hawai'i, and my wife is Hawai'ian. Hawaiians Grapple With Self-Government Bill.

I don't see this as a good thing. First of all, there are very few "real" Hawai'ians left, and they already live on their own island, living like their ancestors. To surrender up to 40 percent of the land is going to cause problems in the real estate market.

And on top of that, just look at what happened when we segregated the Indians. Look at the problems they have, and tell me it's a good idea to split the islands in half, especially when a majority of people don't want it to happen.

This is going to be a bad idea, but then again Liberals are well known for implementing bad ideas. And Hawai'i is a very Liberal state.

July 19, 2005

Hildabeast goes for the Illegal vote

You won't believe this. On the other hand, maybe you will. Clinton speaks before Hispanic civil rights conference.

Speaking to the nations' largest Hispanic civil rights organization, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., received a standing ovation Monday when she vowed her support for legislation that would allow illegal immigrant high school students to attend college. [emphasis mine]

If they want to go to college here, let them come in legally. Supporting legislation like this only encourages more illegal immigration, and we as a nation cannot withstand much more of this. Mexican Enclaves are popping up everywhere, including here in Memphis. And they are not joining in the "melting pot" that is America. They are keeping their Mexican heritage intact and refusing to assimilate. They demand that we speak to them in their language, because they refuse to learn ours.

This is getting out of control and it has to stop somewhere. Senator Clinton and her ilk are a contributing factor in the destruction of the American culture and way of life. And they know it, and are active and willing participants in the process.

Stop them. Stop them now. Oppose any effort to extend any help or assistance to illegals. That is the only way to chase them back over the border.

What shape are you in?

I think I'm in pretty good health for a sedentary 44 year old. I donate blood regularly, so I know my last blood pressure. When it was taken last week, it was 110 over 70, my last cholesterol check was 102. I'm 6'3" and I weigh 215. But according to the CDC's BMI Mass Index I am overweight. I would have to drop another 16 pounds to get to "normal."

Which brings us to this story: The Government's Fat-Fear Farce.

You're probably fat, too. The average woman is 5 foot 3 inches tall. By the time she hits 141 pounds, the government says she is officially "overweight." At 170, she's "obese." The average man of 5 feet, 10 inches hits "overweight" at 174 pounds. By 209 pounds, he's "obese." Something is wrong here. When people like Cruise, world-class athletes and a fit president are being told by the government that they need to lose weight, perhaps there’s something wrong with our metric.

It is interesting about the politics of the study itself:

But last April, a study commissioned by the National Institutes of Health urged by critics of the obesity hysteria confirmed what less hysterical health researchers had suspected all along. The 400,000 figure was wrong. And not by a little bit. The actual figure is closer to 100,000. And guess what? According to recent research, people who are slightly "overweight" are actually healthier than those who are normal weight. When you factor in the number of lives saved by being modestly overweight, the number of people who die due to obesity drops to around 25,000.

The CDC has been reluctant to embrace the new study’s figure. That might have something to do with the fact that the CDC’s director, Julie Gerberding, was co-author of the 400,000 study. In fact, a subsequent internal investigation revealed that the CDC may have actually known that the original study was flawed! It seems the study was published over objections from peer-reviewers due to internal politics. In other words, because the boss wrote the study.

Just one more case of bad science, activist researchers who make the facts fit what they think is right, instead of admitting they were wrong and adjusting themselves to fit the facts.

Sheesh.

Spot the errors

And finally, a fun puzzle. There are two errors in this picture from McDonald's. Can you spot them? Click on the picture for a larger view.

July 18, 2005

The Democrat double standard

As usual, our feckless friends the Democrats are showing that they have one standard for themselves and another one for everybody else. Let the Screaming Match Begin.

This whole Plamegate is a non-starter. People are calling for Karl Rove's head when it hasn't even been proven that a crime has been committed. Ms. Plame had to have been on assignment within the last five years, she hadn't been on assignment outside the U.S. in nine years. It's also been stated by the prosecutor that Mr. Rove is not the target of the investigation.

How much clearer can you get? Obviously facts don't get in the way of a good Democrat rant.

Then comes the other side of the coin. Sandy 'Burglar' Berger was literally caught with his pants down and full of classified documents. He then took these highly classified documents home and destroyed them "by accident." What does he get? A slap on the wrist and loss of his security clearance for a couple of years.

Why we let him off so easily I'll never know. If I had some something like this when I had a security clearance, I would have been in prison for years. Such is the politics of the powerful I guess.

At least when you're a Democrat.

Biodiesel isn't the way to go

This is something I've known for a long time: Study says ethanol not worth the energy.

This is one of those ideas that sound good, rather than a good, sound idea.

But researchers at Cornell University and the University of California-Berkeley say it takes 29 percent more fossil energy to turn corn into ethanol than the amount of fuel the process produces. For switch grass, a warm weather perennial grass found in the Great Plains and eastern North America United States, it takes 45 percent more energy and for wood, 57 percent.

This is because you must harvest this energy, which takes a lot of energy to harvest. Corn, wood, grass, are all dispersed over a wide area, instead of the other way around, with oil you need only drill a single hole and have all of it right there. Oil requires only a single "cracking" to separate it into the different chemicals that we use out of it. Biodiesel requires a set of processes to change biomass into biodiesel.

We need to look elsewhere to solve our energy needs.

July 15, 2005

Rollover!

It was always a big deal in my family to watch the odometer roll over in our cars. Well, I hit the big 10,000 last night. Mike was the lucky guy to roll it over.

Thanks Mike!

July 14, 2005

The second tragedy of 9/11

From Cox and Forkum: Art of Desecration.

The memorial of the 9/11 attack that is being put in the International Freedom Center is becoming more and more like an apology for causing them to attack us as it is a memorial for those who died in the most vicious attack against our country since Pearl Harbor.

I am so bent out of shape over this that it's impossible to put into words my feelings without bringing out my Navy language, and trust me I could strip the paint off the bulkheads with my language. Thankfully I don't use that terminology anymore, but things like this bring it out of me.

I ask you to follow the link to Cox and Forkum above, check out the post and follow their links as well. Don't let the Left prevail on this, the hallowed ground of this century.

Hoist by their own Petard

For those of you who aren't familiar with the phrase, "hoist by your own Petard," they were early fuse-activated grenades. With quality control what it was back then, some fuses burned faster than others. You might find your Petard going off in your hand, blowing you into the air. Hence the phrase.

Well,the Liberal New York Times finds themselves hoist by their own Petard. Klein's 'Truth About Hillary' Hits N.Y. Times Again; Paper Lashes Out.

The Truth About Hillary has debuted at #2 on the NYT Best Seller list, embarrassing the paper. While they can celebrate hit pieces against the President and his Administration all day long, this hit piece against Hillary has the NYT in an uproar.

The liberal Gray Lady apparently doesn't like the fact that one of its own - Klein is former editor of the New York Times Magazine - penned a biting biography of one of the paper's icons, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The Times has yet to review the book, but took the unusual step in Sunday's book section to publish a disclaimer attacking the book from pillar to post in a sidebar column adjacent to the best-seller list.

"'The Truth About Hillary' has united [no easy task] literary critics," Timesman Dwight Garner fumed, adding "it is easily this year's most vilified book."

Like I said, it's hated only because it goes against Hillary. Otherwise the author would be on every talk show, the book would be reviewed from now until Wednesday, and it would be the talk of the town. Well, it is the talk of the town despite the best efforts of the media to squelch the talk.

Move to the center

In an unsurprising move to the Right, Senator Clinton is a co-sponsor of a bill to increase the size of the Army by 80,000. Dems aim to increase army size.

This is another move for her to appear Hawkish. She wants that uncommitted center vote and as much of the Right as she can fool. Don't believe it. She won't vote for it when the time comes. She will complain that some amendment has 'poisoned' the bill.

Besides, the bill is largesse anyways. The Congress already voted for a 30,000 troop increase and the Army is having difficulty in meeting that goal. Remember when all the news was "Army can't meet it's recruiting goals?" That was because of the base increase of the Army, not because there aren't willing recruits signing up.

Anyway, don't be fooled by Hillary's machinations.

July 13, 2005

The end of an era

'Tis a sad day indeed. The End of a Floppy Era.

This article goes into the passing of an icon for the past 30 years, the Floppy Disk. Although they haven't been "floppy" since the demise of the 5 1/4" disk, the name stuck. I know, I know, the media inside was floppy... Sheesh.

Anyway, with the advent of the Universal Serial Bus and the USB thumb drive, floppys are truly dead. USB drives hold more, are faster and more convenient to tote around.

I started out with computers on a borrowed RCA Elf. It had a whopping 2K of memory, and no storage capability at all. No floppy disk, not even a port to save files and programs to "stringy floppy," i.e. cassette tapes. The whole computer was a bare motherboard, with a Hexadecimal keypad as part of the board. Those were the fun days, when a computer could do anything. Where we wondered how we would fill all of that cavernous memory. Now we have problems running out of memory when we *only* have a gigabytes worth.

Such were the days, when computers were magical items. We never even dreamed of such things as GUIs, the Internet, or instant communications across the world and all that. That was still science-fiction in the 1970's.

I shall miss my floppies, even though I have a 1 gig thumb drive.

The Hildabeast

Here you go. The truth about Hillary.

I'm rattling the tip jar because I want to read this book, but I can't afford the cash to get it.

My friend Mike posted that Hillary is "Darkly Nixonion." I think she's worse than that.

This woman is evil. She is dark. And she is driven – even beyond my worst nightmares.

I had long recognized parallels between Hillary and Richard Nixon. But the comparison does an injustice to Nixon. While both were exceedingly ambitious, Nixon reached a point in his presidency where he let go of power for the good of the country. Hillary would never do that. Bill would never do that.

"The comparison between Hillary Clinton and Richard Nixon can be pushed only so far," writes Klein. "Whereas Nixon sought power in large part to overcome his low self-esteem, Hillary seeks power because she has unrealistically high self-esteem. With Hillary, we are dealing with a woman whose need for dominance is far more pathological than Nixon's."

She actually believes she is entitled to become president. The only way she could be denied would be through some kind of fraud or chicanery.

The Hildabeast would be the worst thing that could happen to our country. Not because she's a woman, but because of her mindset, her quest for power, her abuse of power. Look at all of the Clinton-Gates she was at the center of during her Tenure as First Lady. Look at what she accomplished (and almost accomplished) while holding no political power. Now think of her in power and having the ability to carry out her plans.

*shudder*

July 12, 2005

Turning a corner with my recovery

I work as a peer counselor, which means I actively listen to my clients, all of whom have a mental health diagnosis. The job requires me to have a mental health diagnosis as well, which means I have to be certified crazy to work at my job.

It also requires me to go through a lot of training to keep up with the latest in the mental health field. We are also changing models at work, going from a socialization model to a recovery model. We are now expected to start training these people to cope with their illnesses so that they can return (or go) to work or other productive activity.

One of the things I was recently trained on was the Wellness Recovery Action Plan or WRAP.

This is something for any person with almost any serious condition to try and help with the continued recovery from the condition.

It's very simple, you need only a 3 ring binder, 5 tabs and some lined paper.

The link above runs down the whole system in synopsis form, enough for you to get a good idea of what it is about.

I am starting to use this system to improve the quality of my own recovery. I just so happen to carry a FranklinCovey Day Planner with me wherever I go, so this will allow me to carry my WRAP with me at all times.

My case manager has been instructed to locate this planner at all costs if I end up in the hospital, as Section 5 (Crisis Plan) is meant to cover everything that needs to be done in just such a case.

I for one would love to return to being a CIO again, so I can support my family and get them the care that they need.

Here's hoping this turns a corner for me to get back on course to where I should be.

July 11, 2005

New links coming up

I just wanted to let you know about a couple of new links I will be putting up in the next couple of days.

First is Memphis Red Blogs. This is a loose conglomeration of Memphis Bloggers, of whom I am one. You get to see RSS feeds on all of us on the page, so if anything interests you you can check out my fellow bloggers.

I have been neglectful of this blog for a while, and I aim to change that. I normally post 3-4 posts a day here, and I will look for an extra post to put up there. No mention of any posts on MRB will be made here, and I promise I won't duplicate posts.

The other is Commentary Today. I happened across this one from another source and I am going to look at this one a while before posting it. It's a two column page that has Liberal commentators in the left column and Conservative commentators in the right. If I find anything interesting, I will be sure to bring it to your attention.

The clock is ticking

In light of 9/11 and 7/7, this article has come up. U.S. Terror Attack — 'Ninety Days at Most'.

I have no idea if this guy is right or not as far as his timeline. Only the bombers know when they will strike, and they don't tell us until after the bombs have gone off.

But I do like his advice.

Since mass transportation is the next attack, when you travel to work have with you, a bottle of water, a small towel and a flashlight. What happened in London is exactly a point to look at. Those people who were close to the bombs died, then others were injured or died from inhaling the toxic fumes or getting trampled. The reason you take a bottle of water and a towel is that if you wet the towel and put it over your face, you can protect yourself against the fumes and get yourself out of there.

Don't be bashful. If your gut feeling tells you when you walk onto a bus there is something unusual or suspicious, get out and walk away. You may do it 10 times for no reason, but there will be one time that saves your life. Let your sixth sense direct you.

Try to break your routine. If you travel during rush hour every day, try to get up a little earlier and drive to work or take the train when it’s still not full. Don’t find yourself every day in the midst of rush hour. Terrorists are not going to waste a bomb on a half-empty train.

Always be aware, always be prepared. I think that is always good advice, terrorist attacks or not. Follow that advice and you will be immeasurably better off than those who aren't.

This land was your land

Here is something that came up while I was at work Friday. Build condos – or go to jail: Judge threatening county planners with prison if development not OK'd.

Here's the story. Developer wants to build a new development. County Commission says no. Residents say no. Developer finds judge who says yes. Now judge is threatening the County Commission with jail time if they don't change their votes.

I think this judge is overstepping his bounds, don't you? If all we have to do when there is something we don't like is go to a sympathetic activist judge, then something is drastically wrong with the system. Judges should not, must not have that kind of power. The power for one branch of government to threaten and force another branch to do something does not exist anywhere in any governmental charter.

The Executive branch is charged with selecting nominees to the bench. The Legislative branch approves these nominees, and determines the number of judges needed in each court. It is also up to the Legislative branch to impeach and remove judges who are not discharging their duties properly.

It is the job of the Executive branch to enforce the law of the land. The Legislative writes these laws and the Judiciary determines if the laws are legal. That is how the system works.

I do not think that this case falls into the proper operation of the government. The judge in this case has overstepped his bounds.

The County Commission turned the developer down because there was insufficient infrastructure to support the development. The area in question is already overdeveloped as it is. To have a judge overturn this is like the judge ruling that the Law of Gravity didn't apply to his jurisdiction. No matter how many rulings he makes, the facts aren't going to change any time soon.

Sheesh.

July 8, 2005

No posts today

I have training starting in a few minutes and didn't get up in time to do the normal news cycle. See you Monday.

July 7, 2005

Our disappearing freedoms (part 1)

Here's the true application of Campaign Finance Reform: Political talk isn't cheap, according to ruling.

This is the story about two talk radio hosts who want to help a referendum against a gasoline tax. Their efforts are rewarded by having to come up with a dollar amount to declare to the local election commission as in-kind political donations.

Of course, the Liberal talk radio host who is for the tax just as much as the guys in trouble are against the tax, doesn't have to declare anything.

So the muzzle on free speech is coming down over our faces. What will YOU do about it? Because sooner or later it will affect you, one way or the other.

Our disappearing freedoms (part 2)

In a related story, here is the paradigm shift of the police: The Era of Jackbooted Nags.

The story broaches the idea that police are no longer looking for "real" criminals, but rather protecting people from themselves.

The Anti-Smoking Nazis are after every place that you smoke, including your car and home, especially if you have children.

Before I go any further, I wish to elaborate on my "Nazi" label. I am NOT invoking Godwins Law, but rather properly labeling the people who I am talking about. Nazi is short for National Socialist, people who have a very close ideology to today's Left. They want to destroy ideas that do not agree with them (book burning was a favorite tool of the Nazis. Shouting down different views is a favorite of the Left). They both also want to "control" the people to create a perfect society. The comparisons go on. But I just wanted to peek behind this particular door for you.

Back to the smoking. The anti-smoking crowd want to destroy every place where the smoker goes to light up. This is pretty evident in this paragraph:

Last week at a town hall meeting held by D.C. Councilman Jim Graham, somebody raised the very good question of what to do when noise complaints skyrocket because every smoker up and down U Street is forced out on the sidewalk. And the answer? Crack down with anti-loitering laws.

And smoking isn't the only vice getting the old heave-ho.

In a 2003 sting operation, Fairfax, Va., police officers entered 20 bars, administered breathalyzer tests, and arrested nine patrons for intoxication. Fairfax police Chief J. Thomas Manger declaimed: "Public intoxication is against the law. You can't be drunk in a bar." [emphasis mine]

So the politicians are forcing the police to enforce minor infractions at the expense of pursuing major criminals.

Only in America.

July 6, 2005

Destroying our freedoms

Although a little late for Independence Day, this is still an important read: For Independence Day, Supreme Court Slams Founders.

In talking about Gonzales and Kelo, two cases that SCOTUS recently ruled upon, these decisions have severely weakened our freedoms.

Every right we have stems from government's recognizance that we, the people, are born with our rights intact. We own them. We have property in them. We voluntarily forfeit some of these rights to government, in exchange for protection from outside threats, the administration of justice and the rule of law.

The purpose of the U.S. Constitution, then, is not to tell us what rights we have. We're born with the right to do as we please, so long as we don't harm anyone else.

The Constitution's purpose is to outline what rights we give to the government, and to firmly define the limits of government power. [emphasis mine]

Let that quote sink in for a minute. Now reread what I have bolded and italicized. We, the People, have the ultimate freedom and power, as long as we do not impinge upon the freedom of others. The Constitution does not grant us our freedoms, it recognizes them and tells the government to keep it's hands off. "Congress shall make no law...," "...[S]hall not be infringed," you can't get any clearer than that. What isn't enumerated in the Constitution is left to the People, the several States, and finally to the Federal government, in that order.

So why are we in this situation, where our freedoms, the foundation of our society is being threatened? Because there are people who think themselves above the law. These self-righteous, elitist, stuck-up moonbats literally marvel at your stupidity. They wonder who you manage to get your pants on correctly in the morning without a Government program to train you how. They think themselves your betters, just because they think they are smarter than you are.

These wingnuts would like to think themselves Philosopher-Kings, straight out of Plato's The Republic. They know what's best for you, more than you do. You need to be guided like a child to what is best for you.

So now your freedoms are being taken away, one-by-one, because these Philosopher-Kings think they know what's best for you.

Gonzales, the Interstate Commerce Clause needed to be extended to all possible levels of your life, both inter- and intra- state, so that the benevolent Federal government may look out for you.

Kelo, you shouldn't be living in those run-down houses. Never mind you have lived in that spot for 50 years, own that property and don't want to sell. This developer wants to do more with the property and we know better than you, so we are going to take it away from you and give it to them.

Remember these days well, for they mark the beginning of the end of Liberty for the United States.

Wardriving

If you have a Wi-Fi network, at work or home, you must read this: Wi-Fi cloaks a new breed of intruder.

It's all about people mooching off your Wi-Fi network to do all kinds of nefarious work. And when the police trace it, the trail ends at your door, and there is no way to prove that it wasn't you who did it.

If you do have Wi-Fi, secure it as best you can. Be careful with strange networks and don't do sensitive or secure work over a public "hot-spot," as you could be monitored.

Please take heed. Be careful out there.

Quotes to live by

Some people collect stamps, some people collect cars. I collect one-liners. Stuff like "A Conservative is a Liberal who was mugged."

Well, I came across a page from Right Wing News that has a bunch of famous Patton quotes. George S. Patton is by far our best General of just about any war. His strategy, tactics and guts puts him head-and-shoulders above the rest.

Here are a couple of quotes, the rest is at the link above:

"Do your d*mnedest in an ostentatious manner all the time." -- George S. Patton

"I believe in the old and sound rule that an ounce of sweat will save a gallon of blood." -- George S. Patton

"A good plan violently executed right now is far better than a perfect plan executed next week." -- George S. Patton

"I don't want to get any messages saying that, "We are holding out position." We're not holding anything! Let the Hun do that. We are advancing constantly and we're not interested in holding on to anything except the enemy. We're going to hold on to him by the nose and we're going to kick him in the *ss; we're going to go through him like crap through a goose." -- George S. Patton

"We'll win this war, but we'll win it only by fighting and by showing the Germans that we've got more guts than they have; or ever will have. We're not going to just shoot the sons-of-b*tches, we're going to rip out their living Godd*mned guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy Hun c*cksuckers by the bushel-f*cking-basket. War is a bloody, killing business. You've got to spill their blood, or they will spill yours. Rip them up the belly. Shoot them in the guts. When shells are hitting all around you and you wipe the dirt off your face and realize that instead of dirt it's the blood and guts of what once was your best friend beside you, you'll know what to do!" -- George S. Patton

If you have never watched Patton, you should.

July 5, 2005

Warhammer 40k news

As I have painted my 40k and Epic armies, my skill with a paintbrush has improved a lot. So, in order to try and get more painting points with my Space Marines during a tournament, I have decided to replace all of my tactical squads with new ones.

I also decided to put custom shoulder pads on my Marines so that they look cooler. I replaced one shoulder pad with the Ultramarines Sigil, and the other with a Tactical Squad symbol. I then painted the Tactical symbol with the squad color, so I can tell squads apart when several squads are all together in one big close combat. I used to paint the base edge, but that looks a little cheesy.

I have almost completed Silver Squad, the only thing left for me to do is flocking the base with sand and painting it. But the base will still be black with gray highlights.

When painting my initial squads, I also made a rather egregious error. I spray painted the marines. Then I found out the spray paint color is not the same color as the paint pot color, leading to two-tone Marines. All of these Marines are painted by hand, then inked to bring out details, which is why they are darker than the original marines. I also outfitted the Sergeant with a power fist instead of a power sword.

Anyway, here's some pictures. With all pictures, click on them for a bigger picture. First of all, the Sergeants:


This guy is the special weapon man in the squad. Instead of having a heavy weapon, he has a Plasma Gun. I don't put heavy weapons in my squads because I want them to move every turn without losing the use of their heavy weapon.

Last but not least, just the standard Marine.

So, what do you guys think? Comments, please.

Prove a negative

Here is an interesting item. State Ruling Upends Burden of Proof.

Last month, the [Washington] state Supreme Court ruled that before you can accuse your lawyer of malpractice, you have to prove you didn't commit the crime.

So they have invalidated our "innocent until proven guilty" by asking the client to prove a negative, i.e. prove that you didn't commit a crime. How do you prove that you didn't do something?

There are places in this world where you have to prove your innocence, rather than the government prove your guilt. I just didn't think that the United States was one of them.

Kyoto news

I lost the link, but I found a post by a fellow blogger about the Kyoto Protocol.

It seems that New Zealand has signed the protocol, thinking that it had nothing to fear. Well, it now seems that they are going to be fined for their violations, to the tune of about $900 per person, and their major industry is sheep farming.

Feh.

July 4, 2005

Happy Independence Day!

Nothing much in the news feeds, everybody is enjoying the holiday. Remember why you get this day off. For some light reading, here is the document that started it all:

The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. —Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain [George III] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by the Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

The signers of the Declaration represented the new states as follows:
New Hampshire
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts
John Hancock, Samual Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."

A heavy price was paid by these people who dared sign. Many of them lost their Fortunes, their families, their lives. All for a single word: Freedom.

And we are losing that freedom today. Guard well what you have left, and always work toward regaining what is lost.

Freedom depends upon three boxes. The soap box, the ballot box and the cartridge box. There is still hope that the soap box and the ballot box can turn the tide. But with your inaction, that chance grows smaller and smaller everyday.

Write your representatives. If you don't know who they are, put in your Zip code to the right over there and find out who they are. Write them and tell them what you think. Tell them if they are doing a good job or not. Stay in touch with them and let them know how you feel about certain legislations that affect you.

It's all up to you. If you don't do it, who will?