I remember a comic from years back, Calvin and Hobbs as I recall. Calvin is sitting on a bench at lunch time, eating. Just then, the school bully sits down next to him, for once minding his own business. Calvin works himself up into a frenzy, thinking about how the bully is going to hit him. Wound up to the point of exploding, Calvin coldcocks the bully, knocking him out. When the teacher shows up to see what happened, Calvin exclaims, "I HIT HIM BACK FIRST!"
I think this best explains our current policy against terrorists. We know they are going to hit us, we know it will hurt, we know the loss of life will be horrendous.
So why not hit them back first? We no longer face a reasonable country as a foe, one who will weigh the advantages and disadvantages before attacking. We face a relatively small group of men who are not afraid to give their lives killing thousands of us in the process.
If we hit them where they live, keep them disorganized, disrupt their plans, we can keep them from hitting us. Which is exactly what our policy has been since Sept. 12th, 2001.
Senator Kerry doesn't like that policy. He prefers to wait until we and our economy is in ruins before doing a damn thing about it. He would rather be REactive than PROactive.
Want proof? here it is, in his own words:
"I will never hesitate to use force when it is required. Any attack will be met with a swift and certain response."What I want to hear are words like this, paraphrased from President Bush:
"In this day of global terror, we will relentlessly pursue the terrorists and any other clear and present threats of the American people until they are dead or captured. No more will we wait until we are attacked, because the next attack will result in mushroom clouds appearing over our cities."That may make me a warmonger, and you could be right. But I ask anybody who would prefer waiting until New York, Chicago, LA, Cleveland, Dallas, et. al. are radioactive craters, please speak up and tell me you want to wait to do something until after a terrorist attack like that.
So what should we do? Hit them back first, or be reactive? Comments, please.
--------


